Muscle worship

Photo Peer Review Confusion

LondonHeel (4)

2019-05-18 18:57

Have to agree that some of the final categorisations seem very odd to me but presumably that was the majority vote? And people often seem to assign relatively innocent pix of someone in underwear/trunks as erotic-erection visible when it's definitely not :)

The other thing is what do you do if a pic falls into several categories, eg poorly lit and body fragment?

Tłumacz

AlexTritos (6 )

2019-05-21 18:14

(w odpowiedzi na)

I agree guys, I have noticed the same problem...

Tłumacz

Mikemelbourne (2)

2019-05-18 20:08

(w odpowiedzi na)

Agree matey. That’s what I get confused about. A guy in his trunks or Speedo’s etc, gets votes sometimes as erotic content and ingenuity don’t know why

I love doing the reviews although I feel like it is a bit of a lottery as to where it ends up in the final decision.

Good point from you sir!!!

Tłumacz

WrestleFlexFTL (0)

2019-05-12 14:38

I’ve stopped doing photo reviews when I saw they said I reviewed photos incorrectly and I’ve never even reviewed them LOL.

Tłumacz

Mikemelbourne (2)

2019-05-09 23:28

Hi all

I love review new photos as I hope we all do.

Do you ever get confused with your assumption vs that of others? Look at this example.... I chose Clean Photo. However this ended up as Mild Content. I don't get how this is mild content. Clearly to me this is a clean photo?

Love your opinions and experiences too.

Tłumacz

MuscleFanQLD (0 )

2019-05-21 08:01

(w odpowiedzi na)

Seems like a hit and miss for me.
One day, I might get the majority correct. :-)
Other days my choices are always reviewed as incorrect. :-(

Tłumacz

Jvallee8 (0)

2019-05-13 08:09

(w odpowiedzi na)

Well said,I agree.!

Tłumacz
Please log in if you wish to post a topic here.